A Scarlet Resurgence: How the Prancing Horse Re-Found Its Bite in the 2024 Championship
Right from the reveal, the SF-24 made clear that Scuderia Ferrari were chasing a definite step-change. The nose remains wide as last year, yet the sidepod inlets now adopt what many describe as a “Red Bull-style” lower lip ahead of the radiator opening. The front suspension keeps the push-rod architecture while the rear retains pull-rod, yet upper wishbone angles have been tweaked to enhance anti-dive at the front and anti-squat at the rear.
What that all means is: Ferrari said to themselves, we have a power-unit that’s competent, a streamer of aerodynamic upgrades and now let’s make sure the car behaves better through the high-speed kerbs and low-speed corners. Because you can extract raw horsepower, but if the chassis and aero bite aren’t matched, you lose seconds in the corners — and in F1 those seconds are fatal.
Design wise, the footnote that the SF-24 is project code “676” and successive development of the SF-23 is telling: it’s evolution, but with enough change to shake the status quo.
On the track this showed immediate signs of promise: sound mechanical grip, better stability under braking, and more consistent tyre behaviour — things that often take months of testing to dial in. The Reddit analysis pointed out that Ferrari’s “most successful car since 2018” claim might not be hyperbole.
Underneath the bodywork is the Tipo 066/12 1.6 litre V6 turbocharged motor, 90° layout, with maximum revs up to 15,000 rpm. The hybrid system features an MGU-K and MGU-H package, consistent with modern F1 power-unit architecture. What matters is how well the thermal and electric systems are integrated. Ferrari improved the cooling inlets and radiator packaging on the SF-24, meaning they could push the envelope more in race trim.
What jumps out when you run the car hard is that the power delivery is sharper — less turbo lag, better throttle response — and the over-the-lap times in qualifying suggest Ferrari has closed the gap to the very top. The ultimatecarpage spec sheet lists approximately 740 bhp from the internal combustion motor alone.
In circuit translation: when the drivers hit the throttle out of corners, they feel the surge, and the chassis holds firm to let that surge translate into forward momentum rather than simply wheel-spin or tyre scrub. That balance is essential.
In its debut season, the SF-24 secured five wins, four poles, twenty-two podiums and four fastest laps. That’s no accident, it is the sum of good engineering, strong driver input (with Charles Leclerc and Carlos Sainz Jr. in the cockpit), and a race team willing to iterate under pressure.
One of the standout moments was the Monaco Grand Prix win for Leclerc — a place where aero stability and mechanical grip go head-to-head. The SF-24 responded admirably. On a contrasting note, the car also exhibited the occasional dip in form when upgrades didn’t hit their sweet spot, for example in Montreal and Singapore.
The pattern: out of the box the car was strong; mid-season challenged; later part of season again showing flashes of brilliance. Why? Because the nature of F1 competition means you’re playing chess with development — get the concept right, but sustain it with reliable updates. Ferrari showed the former; the latter remains the battleground.
Strengths: strong qualifying pace; excellent high-speed corner stability; good braking behaviour. Weaknesses: tyre degradation at certain circuits; update packages that sometimes just recovered rather than progressed.
Leclerc and Sainz had matured within Ferrari’s system; the chassis and power-unit allowed them to extract maximum. When you talk F1, the human side is as important as the hardware. The chassis engineers (among them Enrico Cardile, Chief Project Engineer Fabio Monteccchi) built the foundation.
One anecdote: Sainz underwent appendicitis surgery just weeks before the Australian GP, returned and took a win with this car. That’s not just driver willpower—it hints at a team‐car combination that gives confidence when the driver is at less than 100%. The chassis and systems must be cooperating.
Another twist: The car’s development path included responding to the dreaded “bouncing” behaviour on kerbs and floor-vibration issues, a phenomena that troubled many teams in the new regulations era. Ferrari’s engineers re-balanced the setup, tweaked suspension geometry and succeeded in mitigating the worst of it. That kind of work often goes unnoticed by the casual fan, but in F1 that’s where seconds are made or lost.
In the modern era of F1, with regulated power-units, standardised tyres and aero restrictions, the winning margin is tiny. The SF-24 is Ferrari signalling: “we are back in the fight”. To quote one data-analysis thread: “Ferrari produced their most successful F1 car since 2018”.
What this means for the team and the sport: Ferrari has re-established itself as viable challenger, not just as a constructor of heritage. That shakes up the zero-sum game at the front. For competitors, Ferrari’s resurgence means more pressure. For fans, more drama. For engineers and designers, the SF-24 is a case study in incremental evolution, concept clarity, and the human machine synergy.
Years from now when people look back, the SF-24 will likely be viewed as the turning point where Ferrari reclaimed competitiveness from a period of relative limbo. A well-kept SF-24 chassis could become a prized piece in F1 collections—not because it won the championship (it didn’t), but because it closed the gap, restored momentum, and became the benchmark for the next era (the SF-25 and beyond). In engineering terms, it’s that “step‐change” model that every marque dreams of: reliable enough to race, fast enough to threaten, and modern enough to evolve.
The SF-24 isn’t simply a transport device. It’s the convergence of decades of Ferrari motorsport heritage, the latest in hybrid power-unit tech, and engineering decisions that reflect contemporary F1 realities. When Leclerc fires off a perfect lap or Sainz battles through a tyre‐degeneration circuit, the SF-24 is the instrument enabling it — the patient, capable tool in the hands of elite craftspeople and drivers.
If you're going to pick one phrase to capture the whole story: It’s Ferrari’s revival manifesto.
-
